Gammapedia is archived. No new edits are allowed and no new accounts can be registered.

Windows 2000: Difference between revisions

From Gammapedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Abwayax (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
lolfac
Line 1: Line 1:
<div align=center style="border: 1px solid #000030; padding: .5em 1em; color: #000; background-color: #EEEEEE; margin: 3px 3px 0;">''This article is related to [[Abwayaxian Conspiracy Network]]. Which does not exist!''<br />http://www.aardvark.ie/404-cork.gif</div>
<div align=center style="border: 1px solid #000030; padding: .5em 1em; color: #000; background-color: #EEEEEE; margin: 3px 3px 0;">''This article is related to [[Abwayaxian Conspiracy Network]]. Which does not exist!''<br />http://www.aardvark.ie/404-cork.gif</div>{{Imagecaptionedright|http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v206/missingno/Faces/wtf_face.png|2k variant of [[Teh Face]]}}


'''Windows 2000''' is a preemptible and interruptible, graphical, business-oriented operating system that was designed to work with either uniprocessor or symmetric multi-processor (SMP) 32-bit Intel x86 computers. It is part of the Microsoft Windows NT line of operating systems and was released on February 17, 2000.
'''Windows 2000''' is a preemptible and interruptible, graphical, business-oriented operating system that was designed to work with either uniprocessor or symmetric multi-processor (SMP) 32-bit Intel x86 computers. It is part of the Microsoft Windows NT line of operating systems and was released on February 17, 2000.

Revision as of 15:23, 16 June 2006

This article is related to Abwayaxian Conspiracy Network. Which does not exist!
http://www.aardvark.ie/404-cork.gif

Windows 2000 is a preemptible and interruptible, graphical, business-oriented operating system that was designed to work with either uniprocessor or symmetric multi-processor (SMP) 32-bit Intel x86 computers. It is part of the Microsoft Windows NT line of operating systems and was released on February 17, 2000.

Features

Why use Windows 2000?

  • Costs less than Windows XP
  • Has all the (important) features of Windows XP (sans funny themes)
  • It has "2000" in it, so it must be good