Gammapedia is archived. No new edits are allowed and no new accounts can be registered.
AIDS face: Difference between revisions
From Gammapedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Not much is known about the '''AIDS [[Teh Face|face]]'''. He (or it, but who cares?) has had few mention, but apparently he appears when one gets cyber-HIV, a virus contracted on the [[Internets|innernets]]. He has been reported, on rare occasion, to appear when getting the +[[Letters of the alphabet#E|e]] status on [[IRC]]. It is highly doubtful that this is a variation of [[Teh FACE]], and might be some twin brother or something. It's is also extremely likely that this could merely be a personification of [[AIDS]] itself, who gets bored just waiting around not doing. Yes, merely not doing. Forget this anything, because that would make the statement false. | |||
apparently he appears when one gets cyber-HIV, a virus contracted on the | |||
reported, on rare occasion, to appear when getting the +e status on IRC. It is highly | |||
this is a variation of Teh FACE, and might be some twin brother or something. It's is also extremely | |||
likely that this could merely be a personification of AIDS itself, who gets bored just waiting around | |||
not doing. Yes, merely not doing. Forget this anything, because that would make the statement false. | |||
{{stub}} | |||
Latest revision as of 03:37, 26 July 2007
Not much is known about the AIDS face. He (or it, but who cares?) has had few mention, but apparently he appears when one gets cyber-HIV, a virus contracted on the innernets. He has been reported, on rare occasion, to appear when getting the +e status on IRC. It is highly doubtful that this is a variation of Teh FACE, and might be some twin brother or something. It's is also extremely likely that this could merely be a personification of AIDS itself, who gets bored just waiting around not doing. Yes, merely not doing. Forget this anything, because that would make the statement false.
This article is a stub. Perhaps something can be done to fix it?
