Gammapedia is archived. No new edits are allowed and no new accounts can be registered.
Ikepedia is the officially decreed successor to Gammapedia concerning Gammasphere canon.
Infinitypedia is another successor.
AIDS face: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
apparently he appears when one gets cyber-HIV, a virus contracted on the Intrawebz. He has been | Not much is known about the AIDS face. He (or it, but who cares?) has had few mention, but apparently he appears when one gets cyber-HIV, a virus contracted on the Intrawebz. He has been reported, on rare occasion, to appear when getting the +e status on IRC. It is highly doubtfull that this is a variation of Teh FACE, and might be some twin brother or something. It's is also extremely likely that this could merely be a personification of AIDS itself, who gets bored just waiting around not doing. Yes, merely not doing. Forget this anything, because that would make the statement false. | ||
reported, on rare occasion, to appear when getting the +e status on IRC. It is highly doubtfull that | |||
this is a variation of Teh FACE, and might be some twin brother or something. It's is also extremely | |||
likely that this could merely be a personification of AIDS itself, who gets bored just waiting around | |||
not doing. Yes, merely not doing. Forget this anything, because that would make the statement false. | |||
[[Category: Stubs]] | [[Category: Stubs]] | ||
Revision as of 04:21, 24 July 2007
Not much is known about the AIDS face. He (or it, but who cares?) has had few mention, but apparently he appears when one gets cyber-HIV, a virus contracted on the Intrawebz. He has been reported, on rare occasion, to appear when getting the +e status on IRC. It is highly doubtfull that this is a variation of Teh FACE, and might be some twin brother or something. It's is also extremely likely that this could merely be a personification of AIDS itself, who gets bored just waiting around not doing. Yes, merely not doing. Forget this anything, because that would make the statement false.
