Gammapedia is archived. No new edits are allowed and no new accounts can be registered.
Talk:NoMorph: Difference between revisions
From Gammapedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Um..what about me (06:31, 4 August 2006 (EEST)) | Um..what about me (06:31, 4 August 2006 (EEST)) | ||
: I believe technically "shrinking" would violate the [[Law of Conservation of Mass]], but meh. ([[User:Izwzyzx|Izwzyzx]] 00:06, 5 August 2006 (EEST)) | |||
Well, it's better than having people with Pikachu ears running around ([[User:The Ninja Pikachu|The Ninja Pikachu]] 03:04, 5 August 2006 (EEST) | |||
:Indeed, which is why I went ahead and added you. ([[User:Izwzyzx|Izwzyzx]] 04:58, 5 August 2006 (EEST)) | |||
Latest revision as of 01:58, 5 August 2006
Uh, is TLW really a nomorph supporter? Funny thing to come out of a werewolf... Abwayax 21:27, 1 July 2006 (EEST)
- Yeah, but he has said many times that Pokemorphs are "just wrong". Emperor_Izwzyzx 21:32, 1 July 2006 (EEST)
Changed my mind. Emperor_Izwzyzx 18:59, 4 July 2006 (EEST)
Um..what about me (06:31, 4 August 2006 (EEST))
- I believe technically "shrinking" would violate the Law of Conservation of Mass, but meh. (Izwzyzx 00:06, 5 August 2006 (EEST))
Well, it's better than having people with Pikachu ears running around (The Ninja Pikachu 03:04, 5 August 2006 (EEST)
- Indeed, which is why I went ahead and added you. (Izwzyzx 04:58, 5 August 2006 (EEST))
